Note: One more reflection drawn from last Sunday's sermon on Galatians 1:18-24:
"But the other apostles, saw I none, save James the Lord's brother" (Galatians 1:19).
Who
is this "James" in v. 19?
Is this
James the apostle, the son of Zebedee and physical brother of John? If so, the use of the term “brother of the
Lord” would mean “spiritual brother.”
Is it the
apostle known as James the son of Alpheus, who was, says John Brown, “our
Lord’s cousin”? Thus “brother” would
refer to their near kinship. Calvin held
this view.
Or, is this
James, the elder at Jerusalem, and half-brother of Jesus (cf. Mark 6:3; Jude
1:1)? Is he called an apostle here not
in the sense of being one of the Twelve but in the sense of being one specially
“sent out” by God (“apostle” coming from the verb apostello, to send out), in the way that Barnabas (also not one of
the twelve) is called an “apostle” in Acts 14:4? When Paul recounts the resurrection appearances
of Jesus he notes that Jesus appeared to Cephas (Peter) and the twelve, then
the 500 brothers, and “After that, he was seen of James; then of all the
apostles” (1 Cor 15:7).
Again,
Paul’s point here is that his knowledge of the pure gospel was not dependent on
his visits with Peter and James in Jerusalem but that it was consistent with
them. Paul had harmonious fellowship
with the men at Jerusalem. Contrary to
what Paul’s opponents in Galatia were saying, Paul and Peter and James preached
the same gospel.
JTR
No comments:
Post a Comment