Image: The opening of the Psalms in Codex Vaticanus
Note: The digital age
is truly amazing. Codex Vaticanus has been posted online. Now, you do not
have to travel to Rome’s Vatican library to view the codex, or purchase an
expensive facsimile, or live near a library which has a facsimile. Add this to access to Codex Sinaiticus, which
has been available online for a couple of years now, and anyone can examine the
two codices that have had the biggest impact in dethroning the received text.
I began poking around the codex this morning. I had recently been interested in finding out
how Vaticanus ordered the Biblical books (both OT and NT) and what apocryphal
books it included in the OT. I had not
been able to find a complete listing in secondary sources and had not yet been
able to visit a library to look at a facsimile.
Now, I can access it with the click of a mouse.
My interest in how Vaticanus orders the OT books is related
to the development of canon in the fourth century AD (when the bulk of
Vaticanus was apparently written—some sections were obviously written and added
later [they appear in a completely different writing script which apparently
dates to c. fifteenth century] to fill in gaps in the text, which the online
version now also allows one to see in the opening of Genesis and the book of Revelation).
There was obvious fluidity in the selection of the Old Testament books and also
fluidity with the texts of those individual books. This is a factor that I do not think
advocates of the modern critical text have adequately taken into consideration
when they give such weight to Vaticanus and Sinaiticus in determining the NT
text.
Here is the list and some notes on the OT books in Vaticanus. I have not yet taken a close look at the entire text (e. g., examining additions to Esther and Daniel), so some of the info below might need to be nuanced, but here is a preliminary list.
Vaticanus Old Testament
Books List*
Genesis
Exodus
Leviticus
Numbers
Deuteronomy
Joshua
Judges
Ruth
1 Samuel
2 Samuel
1 Kings
2 Kings
1 Chronicles
2 Chronicles
3
Esdras (LXX 1 Esdras)
2 Esdras
(Ezra-Nehemiah)
Psalms
Proverbs
Ecclesiastes
Song of
Songs
Job
Wisdom
Prologue
to Ecclesiasticus
Ecclesiasticus
Esther (with additions)
Judith
Tobit
Hosea
Amos
Micah
Joel
Obadiah
Jonah
Nahum
Habbakuk
Zephaniah
Haggai
Zechariah
Malachi
Isaiah
Jeremiah
Baruch
Lamentations
Epistle
of Jeremiah
Ezekiel
Daniel (with additions)
*The titles above are taken from
standard English OT usage or from the titles supplied by the online editors (e.
g., 3 Esdras) and not necessarily as they are titled in the Vaticanus text. Apocryphal works in red.
Some Notes on the Old
Testament canonical order and content of Codex Vaticanus:
1. The opening
order: Genesis—2 Chronicles follows the
LXX order with Ruth inserted between Judges and 1 Samuel.
2. The apocryphal book
of 3 Esdras (LXX 1 Esdras) is then followed by 2 Esdras (Ezra-Nehemiah).
3. Next is the poetic
and wisdom literature from the Hebrew Bible, following the LXX order.
4. Next is the
apocryphal wisdom literature of Wisdom and Ecclesiasticus. Note that Ecclesiasticus is preceded by a
prologue. Note: Apocryphal Psalms of Solomon not included.
5. Next is Jewish
diaspora literature, including canonical Esther (with additions), followed by
the apocryphal books of Judith and Tobit.
Note: Apocryphal books of 1-4 Maccabees not included.
6. Next are the twelve
Minor Prophets (Hebrew Book of the Twelve) following the LXX order.
7. Finally, there are
the Major prophets. The “Jeremiah
corpus” includes the apocryphal Baruch and the Epistle of Jeremiah. The Old Testament ends with canonical Daniel
(with additions).
Jeremy,Thank you for posting this. It was exactly what I wanted to know. Due to my perpetual skepticism with regard to men deciding for me what I should consider to be canonical (i.e. Council of Nicea et al) I wanted to find out what other manuscripts might contain some guidance from God that they omitted. In your list I notice there are several apocryphal texts not found. Is that because those were not contained in the Codex Vaticanus?
ReplyDeleteThanks again.
Will
The canon was not decided at the Council of Nicea. The Council of Nicea was convened to refute a man name Arius of Alexandria who taught that Jesus was a created being.
Delete