Recent sermons on chapter one of the 1689 confession (see
here and here) have gotten me thinking about canon issues.
One of the most intriguing and important early lists of the
New Testament books and early Christian writings is that found in Eusebius’ Ecclesiastical History (Book III,
chapter xxv). Eusebius (c. 260-340)
was born in Palestine. He became bishop
of Caesarea in 314 and attended the Council of Nicea in 325. His Ecclesiastical
History in ten books was published in 324-325.
Here is his
list:
“recognized”
books
[homologoumenoi]
|
“disputed”
books
[antilegomenoi]
|
spurious
books
[nothoi]
|
“the holy tetrad of the Gospels”
|
James
|
Acts of Paul
|
Acts of the Apostles
|
Jude
|
The Shepherd [of Hermes]
|
Epistles of Paul
|
2 Peter
|
The Apocalypse of Peter
|
1 John
|
2 John
|
Epistle of Barnabas
|
1 Peter
|
3 John
|
The Teachings of the Apostles [Didache]
|
Revelation (though disputed by some)
|
|
The Gospel of the Hebrews
|
In addition he mentions books “put forward by heretics in the
name of the apostles” but rejected by the orthodox, including Gospels of Peter,
Thomas, Matthias, and others and Acts of Andrew, John, and others.
Notes:
1. Early Christians
were making distinctions among the early Christian writings.
2. The 27 book NT
canon was generally recognized, though Revelation, James, Jude, 2 Peter, and
2-3 John were disputed in some circles.
3. We also see the
outline of what will be the standard ordering of the NT books: Gospels, Acts, Paul’s epistles, general
epistles, Revelation.
4. A distinction was
made between the NT books and others.
5. A distinction was
also made between works that might be edifying but which were not genuine [the nothoi] and heretical books.
6. The four Gospels
were a distinct collection.
7. The letters of Paul
were a distinct collection. They likely included Hebrews as Pauline.
JTR
No comments:
Post a Comment