Note: I preached a sermon on the Canon of Scripture
last Sunday afternoon in the 1689 confession series. As I told a friend today, I’ve had “canon on
the brain” this week. Here are some
notes on Melito of Sardis’ definition of the Christian OT canon:
Melito of Sardis’ list
of the OT canon:
Melito of Sardis (d. c. AD 190) was an influential early
Church Father. In his Ecclesiastical History, Eusebius cites
Polycrates of Ephesus’ description of Melito as “the eunuch, who lived entirely
in the Holy Spirit, who lies in Sardis, waiting for the visitation from heaven
when he will rise from the dead” (E. H.,
V.xxiv). Eusebius also offers his own
sketch of Melito, including a catalogue of his writings (see IV.xxvi).
Here he cites Melito’s letter to a man named Onesimus
in which he discusses the Old Testament books accepted by Christians, with
regard to his six volume work called the Extracts
(Eklogai). Here are the OT books as he lists them in this
letter:
The five books of Moses:
Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy,
Joshua, the son of Nun, Judges, Ruth,
Four books of Kingdoms [1-2 Samuel, 1-2 Kings], two books of
Chronicles,
The Psalms of David,
The Proverbs of Solomon and his Wisdom, Ecclesiastes, the
Song of Songs, Job,
The prophets Isaiah, Jeremiah, the twelve in a single book,
Daniel, Ezekiel, Ezra
Some point of interest
in this list:
1. The book of Esther
is not mentioned.
2. The book of
Lamentations is not mentioned, but it is likely included with Jeremiah.
3. The book of Nehemiah
is not mentioned, but it might have been included with Ezra.
4. The ordering shows
the influence of the LXX. For example: Ruth
is listed with the historical works and Chronicles is listed with Kingdoms
rather than at the end with a grouping of “the writings” in the tri-partite
Hebrew Bible ordering.
5. The listing is
distinctive, however, in that it does not include the apocryphal books. The one exception could be the Wisdom of
Solomon, but it might be that the phrase “The Proverbs of Solomon and his
Wisdom” simply refers to the book of Proverbs.
Conclusions:
1. This list shows
that the early Christians accepted the OT as part of the Christian Scriptures,
contra Marcion.
2. Melito’s OT canon
excluded the apocryphal works of the LXX, showing that at least some early
Christians rejected these works as canonical and, instead, received the same
books as those of the Hebrew Bible.
3. Melito’s OT canon
also gives evidence that there was still some apparent controversy about which
books were canonical, especially with regard to the book of Esther.
JTR
No comments:
Post a Comment