I began a new sermon series last Sunday through the Gospel of
John with a message on John 1:1-5. I had also decided to read John Calvin’s
commentary on John as I preach through the book.
I was intrigued by Calvin’s remarks on the text of John 1:3.
He argues that the last phrase “that was made [ho gegonen]” be taken with what comes before in v. 3, so that it
read “and without him was not anything made that was made [kai choris autou egeneto oude en ho gegonen]” rather than with what
follows in v. 4 (so that it would read: ho
gegonen en auto zoe hen: “what was made was in him life”).
The Calvin Translation Society editors note here that “the
difference in readings lies wholly in the punctuation.” Calvin makes appeal to
the Greek witnesses, writing: “and in this almost all the Greek manuscripts, or
at least those of them which are most approved, are found to agree; besides,
the sense requires it.” One wonders if by “Greek manuscripts” he means hand copies
or printed editions (or perhaps both). At any rate, we see here Calvin’s
interest in examining external and internal evidence to affirm a traditional
reading (or, in this case, interpretation of the traditional punctuation of the
text). At the least, the reference illustrates his interest in establishing the
proper text of the NT ultimately by appeal to the readings in “the divine
original” (i.e., in the copies written in the immediately inspired Biblical languages).
JTR
No comments:
Post a Comment