Image: Roman era mosaic from Tunisia, depicting slaves, c. AD second century
I’ve been reading aloud William Stearns Davis’ A Day in Old Rome (Allyn and Bacon,
1925, 1966) at the Latin table with my boys on Mondays. We recently covered a section
on slavery in ancient Rome.
Davis notes that Roman farming handbooks solemnly classified
farm implements in three categories (125):
I.
Dumb
tools—plows, mattocks, shovels, etc.;
II.
Semi-speaking
tools—oxen, asses, etc. that can bellow or bray;
III.
Speaking
tools—slaves useful as farm hands.
He notes that under the emperor Hadrian an edict was issued “that
a slave could not be killed outright by his master without some kind of consent
by a magistrate,” a law which made “every owner of human bipeds” grumble. The
edict, however, provided slaves “little practical help,” considering that a
master could still order “a punishment so brutal that death is certain, and if
he should murder a servant, slave witnesses can given no valid testimony, and
almost no citizen will turn traitor to his class and prosecute. Half of Rome,
therefore, continues in the absolute power and possession of the other half”
(125).
Davis describes an imagined upper-class household (of the
Calvus family). He notes that while the master and mistress might act kindly
toward a few personal slaves, they ordinarily treat their servants “absolutely
impersonally.” He says: “their presence is taken for granted like articles of
furniture, and their personal problems are ignored” (132). And he adds that it
is considered “good breeding to speak to ordinary slaves as seldom and then as
curtly as possible, just as one should not waste words addressing a yoke of
oxen” (133).
Reading this I thought of how strange the early churches must
have appeared in such an environment.
Consider the household codes of Paul in Ephesians 6:5-9 and
Colossians 3:22—4:1, which assumes slaves and masters worship Christ
together. Not only does Paul exhort
slaves to “obey in all things your masters according to the flesh” but also
masters to give to their servants “what is just and equal; knowing that ye have
a Master in heaven” (Col 3:22; 4:1).
What of Paul’s admonition to Christians slaves to remember
that whatever their outward estate they are “the Lord’s freeman” (1 Cor 7:22)?
Or of his meditation in Galatians 3:28 that in Christ “there is neither bond
nor free”? Or of his reminder to Philemon that the newly converted runaway
slave Onesimus returned to him “not now as a servant, but above a servant, a
brother beloved” (Philemon 1:16)?
It is no wonder then in Acts when Luke records an occasion when a Christian
named Jason and other brethren were brought before the city fathers in
Thessalonika, and their accusers cried out, “These that have turned the world
upside down are come hither also” (Acts 17:6).
JTR
2 comments:
What is your take on evangelicals (i.e. PCA, etc.) apologizing for slavery?
Anon, thanks for the comment. I'm not sure what to say about this. On one hand it seems like political "virtue signaling" on the part of a denomination (and makes me glad I am no longer affiliated with one--former SBC). Why not simply preach and live out the gospel in our present circumstances?
Post a Comment