Taylor DeSoto Responding to 20 Common Claims Made Against the TR

Taylor DeSoto continues his prolific blogging pace over at his "Young, Textless, and Reformed" site (He's probably written three articles in the time it's taken me to post this one!). He recently posted an article with convenient links to 20 of his past articles addressing various objections to the TR position. Read the post here. Sample some of the articles below:

Common Claims Made by Critical Text Apologists Answered:

1. TR Advocates are more skeptical than Bart Ehrman
2. Treating Text and Canon the same is a category error
3. P75 proves that Vaticanus is early and reliable
4. Beza was doing the same thing as modern textual critics
5. The CBGM can get us to 125AD
6. There is a “fatal flaw” in TR argumentation
7. The CBGM is going to give us a Bible more accurate than before
8. The CBGM is “God’s gift to the church”
9. The TR position offers no meaningful apologetic to Bart Ehrman
10. The TR position is “anachronistic”
11. The TR position starts with the TR and is circular
12. Adopting the critical text is consistent with presuppositional apologetics
13. There is no doctrine affected between the TR and CT
14. The TR position is “textual mythology”
15. Learning textual criticism is necessary for apologetics
16. The burden of proof is on the TR advocates
17. The Bible does not teach providential preservation
18. There is no difference between Critical Bibliology and Reformed Bibliology
19. It is possible to reconstruct the original autographs with extant evidence
20. The TR position is just fundamentalism, emotionalism, and traditionalism

JTR